Community asks Gina Rinehart to not trash the Kimberley
Gina Rinehart at Australian Bush Summit in Broome
Community call to protect the Kimberley from environmental destruction
Community members held a protest this morning outside the Australian Bush Summit event in Broome where Gina Rinehart was giving a video address.
Ms Rinehart has two pastoral properties in the Kimberley – Liveringa and Fossil Downs – both abut the National Heritage-listed Martuwarra Fitzroy River. Her past calls to take 325 billion litres/year of water out of the river have been met with stiff resistance from the community and Traditional Owners.
More than 43,000 people sent submissions to the WA government in 2021, calling for the protection of the river and groundwater from the type of development proposed by Ms Rinehart.
Concerns have been heightened recently with Ms Rinehart applying for five mining leases on her pastoral interests in the Kimberley.

Community protesting asking Gina Rinehard to not trash the Kimberley. Photo: Environs Kimberley.
Conservation group Environs Kimberley Executive Director Martin Pritchard said:
“The Kimberley is known the world over for its breathtaking landscapes, free-flowing rivers and intact tropical savannahs. The type of development that has been proposed by Ms Rinehart in the past is totally inappropriate and would see the bulldozing of tens of thousands of hectares.”
“The half-a-million visitors that come to the Kimberley every year don’t come to see farmland and mines; they come to see natural landscapes and experience the ancient culture.”
Mr Pritchard said there was also concerns about the critically endangered sawfish that have died on Liveringa station in recent years:
“Liveringa station appears to be a deathtrap for critically endangered sawfish, with 57 known to have died since 2018. We are calling for the artificial infrastructure on the waterway that appears to be trapping these endangered animals to be removed and the site rehabilitated.”
Regarding the applications for mining leases, Mr Pritchard said:
“We’re calling on Ms Rinehart to withdraw these mining leases; we don’t want to see the Kimberley turned into the next Pilbara. If Ms Rinehart doesn’t withdraw these leases then we call on the Cook government to reject them: they extend over waterways and are in the National Heritage-listed area of the West Kimberley – it’s no place for mining.”
The WA government’s new national parks around the Martuwarra Fitzroy River and Margaret River, which are jointly managed with Traditional Owners, are still awaiting final completion. The community is concerned that the finalisation of part two is being held back by Ms Rinehart on Fossil Downs.”
“We want to see the national parks along the Martuwarra Fitzroy River completed without delay, and if Ms Rinehart’s company is holding this back, then we call on the WA government to take back that part of the pastoral lease through compulsory acquisition,” Mr Pritchard said.
“Much of the land proposed for the next part of the national park is useless for cattle and not required as part of the pastoral lease. Ms Rinehart is renting this land from the citizens of Western Australia; she needs to take a responsible approach to the environment and make sure we have decent conservation parks along the Martuwarra Fitzroy River and Margaret River.”
Help protect the critically endangered freshwater sawfish here.
National Heritage listed Kimberley marine park no place for Tassal sea cage fish farms proposal – it must be rejected
Broome-based conservation group Environs Kimberley (EK) is calling on the WA and Federal governments to reject the proposal from global sea cage fish farm developer Tassal to establish 84 barramundi sea cages across the remote, environmentally sensitive, National heritage-listed Buccaneer Archipelago north of Broome.
EK’s submission to the WA EPA assessment outlines seven of the reasons the proposal should be rejected.

Tassal, owned by Canadian giant Cooke Aquaculture Inc., is one of the companies involved in the ongoing salmon sea cage controversy in Tasmania. It recently acquired the existing, relatively small, Cone Bay barramundi sea cage operation in the Kimberley and has put forward a proposal to establish 84 sea cages spread across 50 km in the Mayala Marine Park which forms part of the National Heritage-listed Buccaneer Archipelago.
EK Executive Director Martin Pritchard said the marine and island environment of the Mayala Marine Park and Buccaneer Archipelago is incredibly significant for its environmental values and is no place for a high-risk industry like large scale sea cage fish farms.

Humpback whale calf with its mother. Photo: Matt Deakin.
“Recent experience in Tasmania, and also a massive fish death event at Cone Bay in 2019, show that large scale sea cage fish farming brings many impacts and risks which under no circumstances should be imposed on a globally significant environment like the Buccaneer Archipelago.
“The Kimberley coast is in the top 4% of least impacted coastlines in the world. (Source: Halpern et al 2008)
“The marine environment of the Kimberley, including Buccaneer Archipelago, is a recognised stronghold for species like Humpback whales who give birth here, dolphins, dugong, turtles, rays and sawfish – species which are under increasing pressure elsewhere due to habitat loss, pollution, fishing and global warming.
“The Buccaneer Archipelago is also popular amongst recreational fishers who are concerned about this proposal.

Cone Bay. Photo: Martin Pritchard.
“Here in the Kimberley these marine species have the world’s most pristine environment where they can migrate, breed, raise their young and feed in safety. The many islands too are incredibly significant as refugia for species whose populations have sharply declined on the mainland due to introduced species and changed fire regimes.
“Spreading sea cage fish farming through this remote and pristine marine and island environment brings many risks including pollution, introduction of pests and diseases, attraction of predators, interruption of breeding and feeding patterns, unauthorised access to islands and disposal of large volumes of dead barramundi.
“Because of its remoteness, high tides, fast currents, narrow channels (and cyclones), if there is a major event like mass fish escape or mass disease and death event, it will be logistically very difficult to address.

Edeline Islands. Photo: Martin Pritchard.
“There is absolutely no good reason to put at risk a unique environment like the Buccaneer Archipelago to grow barramundi in sea cages. Fish farming should be undertaken close to population centres and support services and should be developed as closed-cycle operations on land, not in the open sea. This is the case with barramundi farming in the Northern Territory.”
Read more: WA Today's report "Tarnished Tassal brand targets WA barramundi".
Gas and dash fear: WA taxpayers could be forced to foot the bill for another Kimberley clean-up
A petroleum company’s attempts to offload stricken oil and gas infrastructure on an environmentally sensitive peninsula within the National Heritage-listed King Sound for a fraction of the value it was estimated to be worth should ring alarm bells for the WA Cook Government.
Environs Kimberley and Lock the Gate Alliance say the situation highlights the risks the fracking industry poses to the unique Kimberley region.
Deteriorated and inaccessible by vehicle: the causeway to the Point Torment well site. Photo: supplied.
Rey Resources is attempting to offload its Kimberley-based assets and 100%-owned subsidiary Gulliver Productions to an overseas company called China Guoxin Investment Holdings, after writing down the value of its assets from nearly $5 million to about $400,000. In response to this announcement, the ASX sent a series of questions to Rey probing the company's financial situation was sufficient to warrant its continued listing and expressing uncertainty over “the group’s ability to continue as a going concern.”
Documents obtained by Environs Kimberley under Freedom of Information reveal that in 2021, the three King Sound gas wells were a mess, with oil staining on the ground and wellhead corrosion, among 44 possible breaches departmental officials identified. It is unclear what, if any, remediation work Rey has undertaken since inspection.
Environs Kimberley and Lock the Gate Alliance fears there is a significant risk that if Rey Resources successfully offloads its assets, they will be abandoned and the hefty rehabilitation bill will fall to the WA taxpayer, as has recently occurred with New Standard Energy and Advent Energy projects in the Kimberley. The stranding of these wells resulted in multi-million cleanup bills and potentially “profound” ecological damage.

Rey Resources' cleared drill pad at Point Torment. Photo: supplied.
Shortly before announcing this planned “disposal” deal to the ASX, Rey Resources also lodged a state petroleum exploration application to clear grid lines more than 3000 km long for seismic testing across a 5058 km2 tenement near Derby and south east of its existing wells in the Kimberley. Under current WA rules, these tenements are able to be fracked, should Rey apply to do so. This tenement is included in the proposed offload deal.
Environs Kimberley recently wrote to the Foreign Investment Review Board, urging it to reject Rey’s attempts to offload its subsidiary and Kimberley assets. This followed letters to WA Mines and Petroleum Minister David Michael expressing concerns over the company's plans.
Environs Kimberley Executive Director Martin Pritchard said, “It was a reckless decision to allow drilling for oil and gas in the mangrove lined flats of King Sound in the first place. The cost of cleaning up the mess left behind in this remote and sensitive location will run to millions of dollars.
“The Department of Mines and Petroleum has let the drill sites deteriorate to the point where one of them is now inaccessible by vehicle and they’ve had to chopper in staff to investigate.
“The department seems to let these oil and gas companies get away with poor management without consequences. The Petroleum Minister David Michael needs to take charge of the situation to make sure taxpayers aren't footing the clean-up bill for another oil and gas company.
“It’s really clear that fracking in these areas would be an absolute disaster when the government departments can’t manage three wells and make companies accountable for poor practices.”

The Stokes Bay well site. Photo: supplied.
Lock the Gate WA Coordinator Claire McKinnon said, “No oil and gas company should ever have been given permission to drill in an area as environmentally significant as the National Heritage listed King Sound.
“Rey must be forced to fund the decommissioning and closure of all the wells on its tenements. The WA taxpayer must not be left to once again pick up the clean up bill for an oil and gas company.
“This concerning situation shows why it’s so important that the Cook Government ban fracking in the Kimberley.
“The high cost of unconventional gas extraction means it’s likely that if a fracking company was able to get a project going in the Kimberley, it would result in the drilling of many hundreds if not thousands of wells.
“This sorry situation shows the Cook Government is not up to the task of adequately regulating a mere three conventional wells, let alone thousands of frack wells”.
WA Government quietly approves fracking company’s 100 million litre water licence in Kimberley
The WA Government has quietly approved a groundwater extraction licence that would allow an overseas-based fracking company to take 100 million litres of groundwater each year.
While the state’s water department (DWER) approved Black Mountain Energy’s water licence on May 2, no public statement was issued, and the only way to find evidence of the licence’s approval is by searching the company’s Australian subsidiary, Bennett Resources, on the WA Government’s Water Register website.
The licence gives Black Mountain permission to access the groundwater for “the maintenance of unconventional gas wells, dust suppression, mining camp purposes, stock watering and rehabilitation purposes”.
However, the company’s “Valhalla” exploratory gas fracking project is still undergoing environmental assessment, and a public consultation process still needs to be conducted.

Dead duck in Buru Energy wastewater pond
If Valhalla is approved, Black Mountain would drill 20 exploration wells between 2 km and 4 km deep and hydraulically fracture them in up to 70 stages each. It would also require an additional two billion litres of groundwater.
Valhalla is also only an exploration project. Black Mountain’s website makes it clear the company wishes to expand to full scale production. If this occurs, it would require the drilling and fracking of many hundreds of wells. An export-scale project would also require a 1100km high-pressure gas pipeline to the Pilbara, processing facilities, pumping stations, flare stacks, and heavy-vehicle access roads.

Mount Hardman Creek where Black Mountain oil and gas wants to drill and frack
Environs Kimberley Director of Strategy Martin Pritchard said, “If Black Mountain goes into full production with hundreds of wells, the volume of precious groundwater required would be unimaginable.
“This incremental threat of enormous levels of precious groundwater extraction shows why fracking must not be allowed to take-off in the Kimberley.
“Fracking uses toxic chemicals that can pollute our clean water here in the Kimberley, why would we risk that?”
“Giving Black Mountain’s Valhalla Project the go ahead risks opening up the Kimberley to full-scale industrialisation by petroleum companies eager to get at the unconventional gas within the Canning Basin. This would ignite a carbon bomb, at a time when increasingly severe heat waves caused by the burning of fossil fuels and resulting climate change is putting the Kimberley at risk of becoming unliveable.”

Overflow at Buru Energy wastewater pond in the Kimberley
Read local media's reporting on the approval here.
WA Premier takes axe to EPA instead of strengthening environmental protection
WA Premier Roger Cook’s proposed changes to the EPA would slash environmental protections that the West Australian community has spent over 50 years fighting for, according to Broome based conservation group Environs Kimberley.
“These changes would slash environmental protection for iconic places like the Kimberley at a time when its recognised we are in a nature survival crisis and there has been no consultation with conservation groups,” said Environs Kimberley Director of Strategy Martin Pritchard.

The proposed changes include stacking the EPA Board with more industry representatives, getting private consultants to rush through decisions and the removal of the public’s right to appeal decisions on the environment.
“This is straight out of the fossil fuel industry’s playbook, they’ve been trying to weaken our environmental laws for decades. It’s an effective privatisation of what is supposed to be an independent advisor to government on WA’s globally significant environment,” Mr Pritchard said.
“The Premier’s assertion that reforms are needed due to ‘green tape strangling development’ are disingenuous. Delays have come about due to the lack of resources and staff in the EPA and the WA government should take responsibility for that.”
“We’re calling for public consultation on any proposed reforms and that a primary emphasis be put on protecting the environment not rushing damaging developments through.”
“We need a stronger EPA and environment laws. What is currently being proposed is exactly what Liberal Premier Colin Barnett wanted and we can’t believe the Labor Government is willing to gut our environmental laws to fast track damaging projects.”